Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Swaro Z5 vs Zeiss Diavari
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Laelkhunter" data-source="post: 1122137" data-attributes="member: 38154"><p>I had a Zeiss Diavaric-C in 3x9 on my .340 Wby. It was there for 23 years. I really liked it, but started where I couldn't get the rifle to group, so I sent the scope back to Zeiss thinking it needed to be "reworked". They replaced the erector spring(s) , cleaned it, and returned it to me, no charge.</p><p> I noticed some black specks in the scope field near the crosshair. Thinking Zeiss missed something, or did something, I didn't feel safe counting on the scope, so I now have a Swaro Z5 3.5-18 X 44 with BRH reticle. Difference in scopes is night and day, and am very happy I paid the extra $$ and stepped up to Swarovski.</p><p> I had read somewhere on this Forum that Zeiss Service Dept is now another company that does their repairs (Meopta, Minox or something like that). </p><p> I personally think the Diavari is a much better product than the Conquest or the Terra, but if you have to choose between the Zeiss and the Swaro, jump at the Swaro.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Laelkhunter, post: 1122137, member: 38154"] I had a Zeiss Diavaric-C in 3x9 on my .340 Wby. It was there for 23 years. I really liked it, but started where I couldn't get the rifle to group, so I sent the scope back to Zeiss thinking it needed to be "reworked". They replaced the erector spring(s) , cleaned it, and returned it to me, no charge. I noticed some black specks in the scope field near the crosshair. Thinking Zeiss missed something, or did something, I didn't feel safe counting on the scope, so I now have a Swaro Z5 3.5-18 X 44 with BRH reticle. Difference in scopes is night and day, and am very happy I paid the extra $$ and stepped up to Swarovski. I had read somewhere on this Forum that Zeiss Service Dept is now another company that does their repairs (Meopta, Minox or something like that). I personally think the Diavari is a much better product than the Conquest or the Terra, but if you have to choose between the Zeiss and the Swaro, jump at the Swaro. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Swaro Z5 vs Zeiss Diavari
Top