Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Subsonic bad?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="groper" data-source="post: 374126" data-attributes="member: 12550"><p>well, not all bullets are unstable as they go transonic, some are and some arnt... this has been proven many times. Read the jerry teo article shooting the .223 to a mile under MOA accuracy for more proof of this.</p><p></p><p>The only thing that makes them bad for shooting/hunting, is whether they have enough energy and expansion for the desired animal your hunting. As for paper punching, well it dont matter at all, so long as they are accurate. But faster and higher BC is better for less wind dope error.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="groper, post: 374126, member: 12550"] well, not all bullets are unstable as they go transonic, some are and some arnt... this has been proven many times. Read the jerry teo article shooting the .223 to a mile under MOA accuracy for more proof of this. The only thing that makes them bad for shooting/hunting, is whether they have enough energy and expansion for the desired animal your hunting. As for paper punching, well it dont matter at all, so long as they are accurate. But faster and higher BC is better for less wind dope error. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Subsonic bad?
Top