Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Some interesting projectiles in .300 win mag! What do you predict?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Calvin45" data-source="post: 2218217" data-attributes="member: 109862"><p>Hi all, going to try handloading some truly unconventional bullets for .300 win mag this summer (maybe for Father's Day I can escape and do some loading and shooting). </p><p></p><p>they are on opposite ends of the weight spectrum. The first is the 120 grain Barnes tax-tx meant for .300 blackout. It has a bc of .358, and it's a Barnes bullet, while it might lose</p><p>Petals as 300 win speeds I'm not worried about "failure". I want to see if i can hit 4000 feet per second. That'd be wild! The bearing surface of this bullet makes one think it was specifically meant for the .300 win mags neck! And it's basically the same length as a 220 round nose. </p><p></p><p>the other is a Hawk 250 grain round nose. That's right, not 220, 250! Heavy hitter territory here. I have no idea what to expect. I know it'll stabilize in a 1:10 no problem, its actually a hair shorter or just the same length as a 180 trophy bonded tip, it's shorter by far than a 210 ablr. I know Barnes made an original in 250 grain as well. </p><p></p><p>I've included a picture alongside some other 30s.</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]279465[/ATTACH]</p><p>120 tac-tx, 220 cil kksp (old discontinued Canadian bullet company), 250 hawk, 180 tbt, 208 eldM, 210 ablr. </p><p></p><p>anyone have any experience loading these or predictions for how these will turn out?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Calvin45, post: 2218217, member: 109862"] Hi all, going to try handloading some truly unconventional bullets for .300 win mag this summer (maybe for Father’s Day I can escape and do some loading and shooting). they are on opposite ends of the weight spectrum. The first is the 120 grain Barnes tax-tx meant for .300 blackout. It has a bc of .358, and it’s a Barnes bullet, while it might lose Petals as 300 win speeds I’m not worried about “failure”. I want to see if i can hit 4000 feet per second. That’d be wild! The bearing surface of this bullet makes one think it was specifically meant for the .300 win mags neck! And it’s basically the same length as a 220 round nose. the other is a Hawk 250 grain round nose. That’s right, not 220, 250! Heavy hitter territory here. I have no idea what to expect. I know it’ll stabilize in a 1:10 no problem, its actually a hair shorter or just the same length as a 180 trophy bonded tip, it’s shorter by far than a 210 ablr. I know Barnes made an original in 250 grain as well. I’ve included a picture alongside some other 30s. [ATTACH type="full" alt="1623617459949.jpeg"]279465[/ATTACH] 120 tac-tx, 220 cil kksp (old discontinued Canadian bullet company), 250 hawk, 180 tbt, 208 eldM, 210 ablr. anyone have any experience loading these or predictions for how these will turn out? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Some interesting projectiles in .300 win mag! What do you predict?
Top