Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
So Will the .270 Win Overtake the CM's and PRC's?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="VLD Pilot" data-source="post: 1947442" data-attributes="member: 103947"><p>I have O percent faith in Nosler's LRAB BC claim. Brian Litz does all the data and testing of all the low drag LR bullets and his numbers were much lower than Noslers claim. Also the range data doesn't jive with the impacts. Usually 1-1.5 moa off on long range testing. Good bullet, incorrect ballistic info given. The BCs are much closer to the original Accubond before the LR version came out. There not much different In numbers when tested.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="VLD Pilot, post: 1947442, member: 103947"] I have O percent faith in Nosler's LRAB BC claim. Brian Litz does all the data and testing of all the low drag LR bullets and his numbers were much lower than Noslers claim. Also the range data doesn't jive with the impacts. Usually 1-1.5 moa off on long range testing. Good bullet, incorrect ballistic info given. The BCs are much closer to the original Accubond before the LR version came out. There not much different In numbers when tested. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
So Will the .270 Win Overtake the CM's and PRC's?
Top