Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Side Arm for Grizzly Country
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pdvdh" data-source="post: 2046912" data-attributes="member: 4191"><p>A guy can blow up any firearm if he tries hard enough. Those aren't pictures of revolver failures to function. They're pictures of revolver owners failures to function. I've seen photos of bolt action rifles rupturing also. Normally the fault of the owner/operator. Some guys can break an anvil.</p><p></p><p>If I post photos of crushed cars in a salvage yard, do the photos speak to the functional reliability of those cars prior to the collisions that sent them to the salvage yard?</p><p></p><p>This will help clarify your opinions and beliefs. Is it your position that semi-auto pistols are more functionally reliable than revolvers, day-in and day-out, across the full spectrum of sidearm users, and fed the full spectrum of ammunition available for purchase and use?</p><p></p><p>Beyond being the more reliable weapon, revolvers are almost universally regarded as the more user friendly and simpler to operate weapon, compared to pistols. Most firearms trainers agree. Simpler is always a benefit, under life and death duress.</p><p></p><p>Gunsmith repair records should be a fair way to identify function failure rates. Certainly better than photos of ruptured revolvers.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pdvdh, post: 2046912, member: 4191"] A guy can blow up any firearm if he tries hard enough. Those aren't pictures of revolver failures to function. They're pictures of revolver owners failures to function. I've seen photos of bolt action rifles rupturing also. Normally the fault of the owner/operator. Some guys can break an anvil. If I post photos of crushed cars in a salvage yard, do the photos speak to the functional reliability of those cars prior to the collisions that sent them to the salvage yard? This will help clarify your opinions and beliefs. Is it your position that semi-auto pistols are more functionally reliable than revolvers, day-in and day-out, across the full spectrum of sidearm users, and fed the full spectrum of ammunition available for purchase and use? Beyond being the more reliable weapon, revolvers are almost universally regarded as the more user friendly and simpler to operate weapon, compared to pistols. Most firearms trainers agree. Simpler is always a benefit, under life and death duress. Gunsmith repair records should be a fair way to identify function failure rates. Certainly better than photos of ruptured revolvers. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Side Arm for Grizzly Country
Top