Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Short barrel 6.5 prc
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BrentM" data-source="post: 2595938" data-attributes="member: 61747"><p>I can see that. I know I have zero issue running a 140 at 2950 vs the 2765 shown for an 18. I think the exercise was simply to pick a charge and do a length test, makes sense. I just don't know that 20 is more or less optimal then other other lengths. I suppose if you have a target fps in mind and know it's roughly 25-30 fps loss then you work back from that. Now that I think it through, that seems to be what you are saying, ie the factory 147 fps example a 26 to 20" shows 3010 - 150 = 2860.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BrentM, post: 2595938, member: 61747"] I can see that. I know I have zero issue running a 140 at 2950 vs the 2765 shown for an 18. I think the exercise was simply to pick a charge and do a length test, makes sense. I just don't know that 20 is more or less optimal then other other lengths. I suppose if you have a target fps in mind and know it's roughly 25-30 fps loss then you work back from that. Now that I think it through, that seems to be what you are saying, ie the factory 147 fps example a 26 to 20" shows 3010 - 150 = 2860. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Short barrel 6.5 prc
Top