Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Semi Custom Kimber Montana 280AI
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="yawn" data-source="post: 940549" data-attributes="member: 13540"><p>There are 2 points here</p><p> firstly the saami vs traditional discussion- which involves the new spec being shorter by .014 so if new nosler brass is fired in the traditional chamber it will stretch to fit the traditional chamber. If you search back through older threads on the topic here you will find that Im not convinced there is a difference , one of the reasons Im not convinced is I can fire new SAAMI nosler 280ai brass in my chamber with no stretch at all and yet still fire form standard .280rem with ease .How can there be a difference ? as you pointed out the .018 difference should be to much to close the bolt easily on the standard 280 rem .I have in the past threads raised this and other points. Im more inclined to believe the second link from my post above which shows no difference at all. But either way </p><p>( and this is the second point) if SAAMI nosler brass is to short for a traditional chamber as is claimed ( or even the same as Im more inclined to believe ) then given the original ackley is .04 shorter than than a standard 280 rem at the neck shoulder junction to promote fire forming standard 280 rem , how is it possible the saami chamber is to long to fire form standard 280 rem as you claim? </p><p>You cant have nosler saami 280ai brass stretching to fit a traditional chamber AND have the SAAMI chamber to long to firefore standard 280 rem. That's a complete contradiction</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="yawn, post: 940549, member: 13540"] There are 2 points here firstly the saami vs traditional discussion- which involves the new spec being shorter by .014 so if new nosler brass is fired in the traditional chamber it will stretch to fit the traditional chamber. If you search back through older threads on the topic here you will find that Im not convinced there is a difference , one of the reasons Im not convinced is I can fire new SAAMI nosler 280ai brass in my chamber with no stretch at all and yet still fire form standard .280rem with ease .How can there be a difference ? as you pointed out the .018 difference should be to much to close the bolt easily on the standard 280 rem .I have in the past threads raised this and other points. Im more inclined to believe the second link from my post above which shows no difference at all. But either way ( and this is the second point) if SAAMI nosler brass is to short for a traditional chamber as is claimed ( or even the same as Im more inclined to believe ) then given the original ackley is .04 shorter than than a standard 280 rem at the neck shoulder junction to promote fire forming standard 280 rem , how is it possible the saami chamber is to long to fire form standard 280 rem as you claim? You cant have nosler saami 280ai brass stretching to fit a traditional chamber AND have the SAAMI chamber to long to firefore standard 280 rem. That's a complete contradiction [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Semi Custom Kimber Montana 280AI
Top