Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Wolf Hunting
See a wolf... what would you do?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Coyboy" data-source="post: 588901" data-attributes="member: 3733"><p>One problem I see is the demise of a sustainable food source if the **** hits the fan.</p><p></p><p>Back in the 1920's we suffered a period of depression that had people in rural and metropolitan areas suffering and starving. Wild game numbers during that time were low thru much of the Midwest and Western states, years of over harvest by commercial hunters had devastated the game populations.</p><p></p><p>Think of how many people could have been feed during that time period had the wild game numbers been similar to what we had in 1800 or 1990.</p><p></p><p> When Lois and Clark mapped the west the wolf was there, the NATIVE wolf, and in there journals they talk about the magnitude of game animals that inhabited the plains. So there is/was a balance to be had.</p><p></p><p>Put 5 million hunters in the mix and 300 million people, yes we will compete for food. Unfortunately this isn't 1800 and we don't have the wild spaces for the 20 fold numbers of game that once existed. The ideology of the environmentalist is save the animals screw the humans.</p><p></p><p>Those same environmentalist want to live in a big house made of wood bought with there 5-6 figure income. Yet save the trees the spotted owl lives in, that there house was built with. If you live the life of a true environmentalist you sure as hell better live in a mud and straw house, with no electricity before you effect the lives of real land stewards with your extremist vision of animal equality.</p><p></p><p>Attrition of certain species is an inevitable fact of life in the world we live in, some day it will be the humans who will suffer at the hands of some microscopic bug or germ. But we humans think we can control every aspect of the world we live in. The liberal tree huggers want to dictate there views on everyone and they squeal the loudest and are heavily funded. The good old boys in a pick-up truck want to continue on unmolested with the life they know.</p><p></p><p>Unregulated wolves get in the way of that life, the pot has been boiling and with out action, the steam has to be released. </p><p></p><p>LETS CHANGE THE QUESTION!</p><p></p><p>When the hybreed/wolf/dog/whatever is 30 yards from your back door and your kids are out waiting for the bus. WOULD YOU PULL THE TRIGGER??</p><p></p><p>If you wouldn't how often are you letting your kids play in the woods or field behind your house?</p><p></p><p>How much of my life or yours need to change so the hipee's in the city can feel good about a wolf running around 200 miles away, in my fricking back yard?</p><p></p><p>Is there room for wolves in Wisconsin, Yes the 150 the 1984 plan called for. Not the 1500 plus we have now.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Coyboy, post: 588901, member: 3733"] One problem I see is the demise of a sustainable food source if the **** hits the fan. Back in the 1920's we suffered a period of depression that had people in rural and metropolitan areas suffering and starving. Wild game numbers during that time were low thru much of the Midwest and Western states, years of over harvest by commercial hunters had devastated the game populations. Think of how many people could have been feed during that time period had the wild game numbers been similar to what we had in 1800 or 1990. When Lois and Clark mapped the west the wolf was there, the NATIVE wolf, and in there journals they talk about the magnitude of game animals that inhabited the plains. So there is/was a balance to be had. Put 5 million hunters in the mix and 300 million people, yes we will compete for food. Unfortunately this isn't 1800 and we don't have the wild spaces for the 20 fold numbers of game that once existed. The ideology of the environmentalist is save the animals screw the humans. Those same environmentalist want to live in a big house made of wood bought with there 5-6 figure income. Yet save the trees the spotted owl lives in, that there house was built with. If you live the life of a true environmentalist you sure as hell better live in a mud and straw house, with no electricity before you effect the lives of real land stewards with your extremist vision of animal equality. Attrition of certain species is an inevitable fact of life in the world we live in, some day it will be the humans who will suffer at the hands of some microscopic bug or germ. But we humans think we can control every aspect of the world we live in. The liberal tree huggers want to dictate there views on everyone and they squeal the loudest and are heavily funded. The good old boys in a pick-up truck want to continue on unmolested with the life they know. Unregulated wolves get in the way of that life, the pot has been boiling and with out action, the steam has to be released. LETS CHANGE THE QUESTION! When the hybreed/wolf/dog/whatever is 30 yards from your back door and your kids are out waiting for the bus. WOULD YOU PULL THE TRIGGER?? If you wouldn't how often are you letting your kids play in the woods or field behind your house? How much of my life or yours need to change so the hipee's in the city can feel good about a wolf running around 200 miles away, in my fricking back yard? Is there room for wolves in Wisconsin, Yes the 150 the 1984 plan called for. Not the 1500 plus we have now. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Wolf Hunting
See a wolf... what would you do?
Top