Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Sectional density and BC
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hand Skills" data-source="post: 1815465" data-attributes="member: 103303"><p>Agree, both points are moot when discussing expanding bullets which by definition DEFORM on impact.</p><p></p><p>Solids or Hard cast, maybe even FMJ's (bullets that don't change shape when they hit flesh and blood) could warrant a discussion, but even then the difference between .283 and .287 is on the order of 1% <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite12" alt="o_O" title="Er... what? o_O" loading="lazy" data-shortname="o_O" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hand Skills, post: 1815465, member: 103303"] Agree, both points are moot when discussing expanding bullets which by definition DEFORM on impact. Solids or Hard cast, maybe even FMJ's (bullets that don't change shape when they hit flesh and blood) could warrant a discussion, but even then the difference between .283 and .287 is on the order of 1% o_O [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Sectional density and BC
Top