Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Second opinion on seating depth
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SHAGGY101" data-source="post: 1123487" data-attributes="member: 84110"><p>Bart, thanks for the input and copy all the statistical variations. This was is what stemmed my original question of should I go with known consistency or the best group. I absolutely wish I had a bigger sample size... But I don't, that is time and money I don't have. </p><p></p><p>Here are some numbers. Obviously the .090" distance to lands was consistent with my 2 3 shot groups, producing just under MOA groups. If you look at the numbers a little closer, you will realize that the group center has not shifted much at all. I wish I would have done this test and 200yds as well. </p><p></p><p>So which one would you guys choose?</p><p></p><p>.010" from lands</p><p></p><p><a href="http://s1131.photobucket.com/user/SHAGGYbandsaw/media/image.jpg4_zpsszsfooel.jpg.html" target="_blank"><img src="http://i1131.photobucket.com/albums/m555/SHAGGYbandsaw/image.jpg4_zpsszsfooel.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></a></p><p></p><p><a href="http://s1131.photobucket.com/user/SHAGGYbandsaw/media/image.jpg3_zps8ax9lrlh.jpg.html" target="_blank"><img src="http://i1131.photobucket.com/albums/m555/SHAGGYbandsaw/image.jpg3_zps8ax9lrlh.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></a></p><p></p><p>.090" from lands</p><p></p><p><a href="http://s1131.photobucket.com/user/SHAGGYbandsaw/media/image.jpg1_zpsqpwiznqj.jpg.html" target="_blank"><img src="http://i1131.photobucket.com/albums/m555/SHAGGYbandsaw/image.jpg1_zpsqpwiznqj.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></a></p><p></p><p><a href="http://s1131.photobucket.com/user/SHAGGYbandsaw/media/image.jpg2_zpsgxojhdec.jpg.html" target="_blank"><img src="http://i1131.photobucket.com/albums/m555/SHAGGYbandsaw/image.jpg2_zpsgxojhdec.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SHAGGY101, post: 1123487, member: 84110"] Bart, thanks for the input and copy all the statistical variations. This was is what stemmed my original question of should I go with known consistency or the best group. I absolutely wish I had a bigger sample size... But I don't, that is time and money I don't have. Here are some numbers. Obviously the .090" distance to lands was consistent with my 2 3 shot groups, producing just under MOA groups. If you look at the numbers a little closer, you will realize that the group center has not shifted much at all. I wish I would have done this test and 200yds as well. So which one would you guys choose? .010" from lands [URL=http://s1131.photobucket.com/user/SHAGGYbandsaw/media/image.jpg4_zpsszsfooel.jpg.html][IMG]http://i1131.photobucket.com/albums/m555/SHAGGYbandsaw/image.jpg4_zpsszsfooel.jpg[/IMG][/URL] [URL=http://s1131.photobucket.com/user/SHAGGYbandsaw/media/image.jpg3_zps8ax9lrlh.jpg.html][IMG]http://i1131.photobucket.com/albums/m555/SHAGGYbandsaw/image.jpg3_zps8ax9lrlh.jpg[/IMG][/URL] .090" from lands [URL=http://s1131.photobucket.com/user/SHAGGYbandsaw/media/image.jpg1_zpsqpwiznqj.jpg.html][IMG]http://i1131.photobucket.com/albums/m555/SHAGGYbandsaw/image.jpg1_zpsqpwiznqj.jpg[/IMG][/URL] [URL=http://s1131.photobucket.com/user/SHAGGYbandsaw/media/image.jpg2_zpsgxojhdec.jpg.html][IMG]http://i1131.photobucket.com/albums/m555/SHAGGYbandsaw/image.jpg2_zpsgxojhdec.jpg[/IMG][/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Second opinion on seating depth
Top