Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Scopes I own
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="D.ID" data-source="post: 678059" data-attributes="member: 14340"><p>First off: thanks for sharing your findings. I am not surprised about the 4200 6-24x50 as it is one of my personal favorites. I am surprised your leapers out did your mueller. Perhaps more importantly is a personal perspective regarding glass quality vs integrity. I would not waist my time or ammo to sight in a leapers regardless of how good the glass was. Allot of people think the glass is the most important part of a scope. I personally think it is the least. Any scope I ever looked threw could view distant objects better than my eyes could. Will it hold a zero? Seeing it really well sucks worse if you can't hit it. Does it track, repeat and return well. "Seeing it really well sucks worse if you cant hit it." can it take a slip or tumble and keep on trucking. "Seeing it really well sucks worse if you cant hit it." Nice glass is a bonus. It is in my opinion the least important component. Of course you can't hit it if you can't see it but.............."Seeing it really well sucks worse if you cant hit it."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="D.ID, post: 678059, member: 14340"] First off: thanks for sharing your findings. I am not surprised about the 4200 6-24x50 as it is one of my personal favorites. I am surprised your leapers out did your mueller. Perhaps more importantly is a personal perspective regarding glass quality vs integrity. I would not waist my time or ammo to sight in a leapers regardless of how good the glass was. Allot of people think the glass is the most important part of a scope. I personally think it is the least. Any scope I ever looked threw could view distant objects better than my eyes could. Will it hold a zero? Seeing it really well sucks worse if you can't hit it. Does it track, repeat and return well. "Seeing it really well sucks worse if you cant hit it." can it take a slip or tumble and keep on trucking. "Seeing it really well sucks worse if you cant hit it." Nice glass is a bonus. It is in my opinion the least important component. Of course you can't hit it if you can't see it but.............."Seeing it really well sucks worse if you cant hit it." [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Scopes I own
Top