Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Scope leveling idea
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dirtrax" data-source="post: 1973798" data-attributes="member: 78945"><p>The bore is a circle and circles have no inherent level. When a repeatable Natural Point of Aim (NPA) with no forcing of the rifle maintains solid recoil management how can that affect down range performance assuming that the scope is true to gravity and perpendicular? I've tall target tested and cannot find an issue. I completely understand why an optic that isn't "true" will skew things. That's why we use anti-cant levels. The erector needs to travel straight up and down. Isn't this movement relative to gravity and not the rifle? Of course I could be completely wrong.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dirtrax, post: 1973798, member: 78945"] The bore is a circle and circles have no inherent level. When a repeatable Natural Point of Aim (NPA) with no forcing of the rifle maintains solid recoil management how can that affect down range performance assuming that the scope is true to gravity and perpendicular? I’ve tall target tested and cannot find an issue. I completely understand why an optic that isn’t “true” will skew things. That’s why we use anti-cant levels. The erector needs to travel straight up and down. Isn’t this movement relative to gravity and not the rifle? Of course I could be completely wrong. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Scope leveling idea
Top