Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
The Basics, Starting Out
Scope height, cheek weld and eye relief
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MFGRVA" data-source="post: 1915979" data-attributes="member: 114328"><p>I agree about mickey-mousing it, which was the intent of asking for opinions on the adaptations to consider (LOP, scope height, position).</p><p></p><p>The height of the scope is spot-on as it sits. Eye reflief removed as an issue, the LOP isn't really a problem as-is but it is certainly not in danger of being too long. At just a shade under 6'2", "too much" LOP hasn't really been a thing that I've had to deal with.</p><p></p><p>My concern with going with higher rings to enable more eye relief is/was that by raising the scope that I would then need to raise the comb. I could also modify the rail pretty easily to allow the scope to move more forward, but given that LOP is the easiest thing for me to change I'm going to try that first and see how it works, despite my general dislike of slip-on pads.</p><p></p><p>I appreciate the responses so far, if there's something else I'm overlooking please keep them coming.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MFGRVA, post: 1915979, member: 114328"] I agree about mickey-mousing it, which was the intent of asking for opinions on the adaptations to consider (LOP, scope height, position). The height of the scope is spot-on as it sits. Eye reflief removed as an issue, the LOP isn't really a problem as-is but it is certainly not in danger of being too long. At just a shade under 6'2", "too much" LOP hasn't really been a thing that I've had to deal with. My concern with going with higher rings to enable more eye relief is/was that by raising the scope that I would then need to raise the comb. I could also modify the rail pretty easily to allow the scope to move more forward, but given that LOP is the easiest thing for me to change I'm going to try that first and see how it works, despite my general dislike of slip-on pads. I appreciate the responses so far, if there's something else I'm overlooking please keep them coming. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
The Basics, Starting Out
Scope height, cheek weld and eye relief
Top