Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Scope field evaluations on rokslide
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="willfrye027" data-source="post: 2977437" data-attributes="member: 114992"><p>I shoot 2-3k rounds a year, occasionally more occasionally less. I have a pretty good idea of when something is mechanical vs me making a bad shot. I think if there is a "pattern" in those groups that may have been an erector bouncing back and forth. Doing load development for that rifle there were some bizarre POI changes and "flyers" that just didn't seem right. Eventually the scope fully crapped the bed. Leupold will probably say "torqued too tight and broken erector". Vortex seems to use that excuse as well. </p><p></p><p>With regards to group size. Do you know what your rifles true cone of fire is? Ie 30 round group? If not, or if you think that is pointless, we don't speak the same language and probably do not need to keep discussing this.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="willfrye027, post: 2977437, member: 114992"] I shoot 2-3k rounds a year, occasionally more occasionally less. I have a pretty good idea of when something is mechanical vs me making a bad shot. I think if there is a “pattern” in those groups that may have been an erector bouncing back and forth. Doing load development for that rifle there were some bizarre POI changes and “flyers” that just didn’t seem right. Eventually the scope fully crapped the bed. Leupold will probably say “torqued too tight and broken erector”. Vortex seems to use that excuse as well. With regards to group size. Do you know what your rifles true cone of fire is? Ie 30 round group? If not, or if you think that is pointless, we don’t speak the same language and probably do not need to keep discussing this. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Scope field evaluations on rokslide
Top