Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Scope field evaluations on rokslide
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Paladin300" data-source="post: 2966378" data-attributes="member: 115299"><p>The above post was a response to another who questioned an earlier statement. I was only using the glass quality as an example of scope quality control between varying models. There was no intent to have a discussion or to infer any criteria for a scope having a particular glass quality. I was simply using it to illustrate a point, in the same way I used the car analogy. Point being you can get different results from scopes of the same model, therefore a sample of one is inadequate for a valid test. Secondly, different models from an individual scope manufacturer may display a different quality based on the components used. And finally you get what you pay for and you should expect that the more you pay the better the product, however if your goal is light weight scope the tube construction will be thinner and therefore less durable. There are trade off with every option you chose. Again, the glass was just an analogy that was missed by those that are emotionally invested in the test's apparent results.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Paladin300, post: 2966378, member: 115299"] The above post was a response to another who questioned an earlier statement. I was only using the glass quality as an example of scope quality control between varying models. There was no intent to have a discussion or to infer any criteria for a scope having a particular glass quality. I was simply using it to illustrate a point, in the same way I used the car analogy. Point being you can get different results from scopes of the same model, therefore a sample of one is inadequate for a valid test. Secondly, different models from an individual scope manufacturer may display a different quality based on the components used. And finally you get what you pay for and you should expect that the more you pay the better the product, however if your goal is light weight scope the tube construction will be thinner and therefore less durable. There are trade off with every option you chose. Again, the glass was just an analogy that was missed by those that are emotionally invested in the test's apparent results. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Scope field evaluations on rokslide
Top