Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Scope Base opinions for 338LM
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="gpower77" data-source="post: 1146051" data-attributes="member: 80554"><p>Got the Farrell 20 moa base and the nightforce 5x25x56 atacr scope. The Farrell base is plenty high, using 1.125 rings, the scope sits a good 1/2 above the barrel at the objective end. Going to try the 1.00 mediums, as this is the lowest I can find in the 34mm ring size. The laminate stock on the 112 has basically no cheek weld at this height, so its not comfortable to use. Anyone else using the Farrell base and what ring height combo worked the best? Thanks</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="gpower77, post: 1146051, member: 80554"] Got the Farrell 20 moa base and the nightforce 5x25x56 atacr scope. The Farrell base is plenty high, using 1.125 rings, the scope sits a good 1/2 above the barrel at the objective end. Going to try the 1.00 mediums, as this is the lowest I can find in the 34mm ring size. The laminate stock on the 112 has basically no cheek weld at this height, so its not comfortable to use. Anyone else using the Farrell base and what ring height combo worked the best? Thanks [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Scope Base opinions for 338LM
Top