Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Salt Bath Annealing
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WildRose" data-source="post: 2447458" data-attributes="member: 30902"><p>I've done a lot of reading on the subject since Wednesday. The only negative criticisms I've see all came from an article written by the company that manufactures the AMP annealing machines that run about 950.00 more than one of these if you have to buy everything to get set up the first time.</p><p></p><p>I can understand why they'd be negative on SB annealing.</p><p></p><p> [ATTACH=full]342152[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>I am seeing that instead of the recommended 5-8 seconds you'll get better results at 9-11 seconds which is perfectly ok by me.</p><p></p><p>Personally I can't see a better way to ensure consistency of both temp and exposure time.</p><p></p><p>Lot's of the articles and posts I read show guys doing 100-250 rounds in an evening so even at the longer times that's still pretty darned efficient.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WildRose, post: 2447458, member: 30902"] I've done a lot of reading on the subject since Wednesday. The only negative criticisms I've see all came from an article written by the company that manufactures the AMP annealing machines that run about 950.00 more than one of these if you have to buy everything to get set up the first time. I can understand why they'd be negative on SB annealing. [ATTACH type="full" alt="1645185831457.png"]342152[/ATTACH] I am seeing that instead of the recommended 5-8 seconds you'll get better results at 9-11 seconds which is perfectly ok by me. Personally I can't see a better way to ensure consistency of both temp and exposure time. Lot's of the articles and posts I read show guys doing 100-250 rounds in an evening so even at the longer times that's still pretty darned efficient. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Salt Bath Annealing
Top