Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
RL-17 vs H4350 and temperature variance
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="kaseyfied" data-source="post: 753212" data-attributes="member: 13743"><p>The cooler test is a "real world" proven method.. if u think 60 fps variant in a load is good then i dont know what to tell u.. thats between 8-10 inches of error at 1k not counting human.. i would never be happy with any load that has a 60fps swing... i dont settle for anything over 18fps swing</p><p>... thats why ibuse hodgden powders.. they work.. i think.somethings just wrong.with the.load ur using.. just cus its a half minute load doesnt meam its the best load..</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="kaseyfied, post: 753212, member: 13743"] The cooler test is a "real world" proven method.. if u think 60 fps variant in a load is good then i dont know what to tell u.. thats between 8-10 inches of error at 1k not counting human.. i would never be happy with any load that has a 60fps swing... i dont settle for anything over 18fps swing ... thats why ibuse hodgden powders.. they work.. i think.somethings just wrong.with the.load ur using.. just cus its a half minute load doesnt meam its the best load.. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
RL-17 vs H4350 and temperature variance
Top