Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Results of H50BMG in a .264 Win. Mag.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rifleman97" data-source="post: 2123568" data-attributes="member: 103996"><p>They did. But since it REALLY didn't sell well, I still see some available on shelves (one of the only things left) and people still have it. So it's data is still beneficial to have for a couple years, similar to 872 before US869 replaced that.</p><p></p><p>People worried that the spherical based powder of 869 will be far warse temp stability than the extruded 50bmg, but honestly they were fairly close in temp sensitivity and burn rate to begin with.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rifleman97, post: 2123568, member: 103996"] They did. But since it REALLY didn’t sell well, I still see some available on shelves (one of the only things left) and people still have it. So it’s data is still beneficial to have for a couple years, similar to 872 before US869 replaced that. People worried that the spherical based powder of 869 will be far warse temp stability than the extruded 50bmg, but honestly they were fairly close in temp sensitivity and burn rate to begin with. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Results of H50BMG in a .264 Win. Mag.
Top