Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Resizing reamer Specs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ntsqd" data-source="post: 1988420" data-attributes="member: 93138"><p>In pure theory squeezing the brass .004" when .002" will give you brass that chambers every time, all of the time, is just working the brass that much harder.</p><p></p><p>I'm not qualified to comment on what the reality of this really is. Have one of each made and try both? Then you'd know for that specific chamber. Do so enough times and you could likely predict a trend.</p><p></p><p>Were I to guess I'd say that the eargasplittenloudenboomers might need .004" while the pip-squeaks may only need .002", BUT that is only a guess.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ntsqd, post: 1988420, member: 93138"] In pure theory squeezing the brass .004" when .002" will give you brass that chambers every time, all of the time, is just working the brass that much harder. I'm not qualified to comment on what the reality of this really is. Have one of each made and try both? Then you'd know for that specific chamber. Do so enough times and you could likely predict a trend. Were I to guess I'd say that the eargasplittenloudenboomers might need .004" while the pip-squeaks may only need .002", BUT that is only a guess. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Resizing reamer Specs
Top