Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
Politics Of Hunting & Guns (NOT General Politics)
Reply from Seantor Carl Levin
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Joe King" data-source="post: 756586" data-attributes="member: 47325"><p>I watched the Senate Judiciary Hearing: on what American do to reduce gun violence.</p><p></p><p>That hearing went 4hrs. One thing I took away from it, is that the Anti gun Senators don't give 2 S*^ts about the 2nd, or any part of the constitution, or fact's. They flat out stated that the Bill of Rights was open to interpretation, and should be interpreted. </p><p></p><p>On the other side, there many that pointed out very clearly (with proof to back it up). Senator Cruz (R. Texas) did a damned fine job to that end, as well as Senator Grassley. </p><p></p><p>I'm not sure what will make it out of comitee, and go to vote. Back ground checks likely, They'll send mental health care reform that will not be enforced, They'll try to plug holes that are small leaks, and will be largely feel good measures.</p><p></p><p>an interesting procedure for sure but I have got to say that system is broken worse than any other.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Here's a link if anyone wants to endure 4hrs of spinning wheels, and evasive non-answers</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Joe King, post: 756586, member: 47325"] I watched the Senate Judiciary Hearing: on what American do to reduce gun violence. That hearing went 4hrs. One thing I took away from it, is that the Anti gun Senators don't give 2 S*^ts about the 2nd, or any part of the constitution, or fact's. They flat out stated that the Bill of Rights was open to interpretation, and should be interpreted. On the other side, there many that pointed out very clearly (with proof to back it up). Senator Cruz (R. Texas) did a damned fine job to that end, as well as Senator Grassley. I'm not sure what will make it out of comitee, and go to vote. Back ground checks likely, They'll send mental health care reform that will not be enforced, They'll try to plug holes that are small leaks, and will be largely feel good measures. an interesting procedure for sure but I have got to say that system is broken worse than any other. Here's a link if anyone wants to endure 4hrs of spinning wheels, and evasive non-answers [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
Politics Of Hunting & Guns (NOT General Politics)
Reply from Seantor Carl Levin
Top