Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
replacing bullet seating dies
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="boomtube" data-source="post: 384031" data-attributes="member: 9215"><p>Mr. Salazar: "This article describes a brief but useful test of bullet seating dies ...Read this article for what it is: a brief test using the dies that I happened to have and which shows a way to test rather than producing any absolute results. This is a limited, hobby time test which I conducted for my own information an entertainment. Enjoy"!</p><p> </p><div style="text-align: center"><img src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_f1TTfqxVUw4/SqJpC2FmKiI/AAAAAAAAAfc/yLYjT3TKoyg/s400/DSCN6806.JPG" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></div> <div style="text-align: center"><strong>RCBS - Hornady - Redding - Vickerman - Wilson</strong></div><p></p><p>Mr. Salazar is a good man. He recognises that his test is brief and is NOT a valid statistical appraisal of the dies he uses any more than an "accuracy" test of single bullets in multipule rifles could be. We should too.</p><p> </p><p>None of us use Wilson hand dies in our presses, Vickerman seaters haven't been made in decades so he is only testing RCBS, Hornady and Redding. A single tested item of a manufactored tool has no statistical meaning at all. Other than telling HIM which of the five seaters he owns is best but, other than his method, his test means nothing to the rest of us.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="boomtube, post: 384031, member: 9215"] Mr. Salazar: "This article describes a brief but useful test of bullet seating dies ...Read this article for what it is: a brief test using the dies that I happened to have and which shows a way to test rather than producing any absolute results. This is a limited, hobby time test which I conducted for my own information an entertainment. Enjoy"! [CENTER][IMG]http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_f1TTfqxVUw4/SqJpC2FmKiI/AAAAAAAAAfc/yLYjT3TKoyg/s400/DSCN6806.JPG[/IMG] [B]RCBS - Hornady - Redding - Vickerman - Wilson[/B][/CENTER] Mr. Salazar is a good man. He recognises that his test is brief and is NOT a valid statistical appraisal of the dies he uses any more than an "accuracy" test of single bullets in multipule rifles could be. We should too. None of us use Wilson hand dies in our presses, Vickerman seaters haven't been made in decades so he is only testing RCBS, Hornady and Redding. A single tested item of a manufactored tool has no statistical meaning at all. Other than telling HIM which of the five seaters he owns is best but, other than his method, his test means nothing to the rest of us. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
replacing bullet seating dies
Top