Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Replacement for Retumbo - 28 Nosler
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Calvin45" data-source="post: 1674968" data-attributes="member: 109862"><p>I see what your mean, of course we don't start at max. At this point I'm not sure what we're arguing about (or if this even constitutes arguing). We both know it's the same powder, same chemical formulation, cut to different size. You've acknowledged that this does affect some things, I've acknowledged that if we're not swapping max loads from one powder to the next (including the same powder from a different lot) there shouldn't be any trouble. perhaps I'm just obstinate and old fashioned (at the age of 27) but I've used both, I prefer the original 7828, I'm unhappy about the decision to discontinue it, I certainly hope that this isn't the beginning of the end for some of the other, arguably replaceable, classic powders like the original 4064, 4350, and 4831, both hodgdon and IMR varieties. I wanted to let the readers on the forum know about it and suspect I will certainly not be alone in finding this turn of events regrettable regardless of the availability of comparable products.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Calvin45, post: 1674968, member: 109862"] I see what your mean, of course we don't start at max. At this point I'm not sure what we're arguing about (or if this even constitutes arguing). We both know it's the same powder, same chemical formulation, cut to different size. You've acknowledged that this does affect some things, I've acknowledged that if we're not swapping max loads from one powder to the next (including the same powder from a different lot) there shouldn't be any trouble. perhaps I'm just obstinate and old fashioned (at the age of 27) but I've used both, I prefer the original 7828, I'm unhappy about the decision to discontinue it, I certainly hope that this isn't the beginning of the end for some of the other, arguably replaceable, classic powders like the original 4064, 4350, and 4831, both hodgdon and IMR varieties. I wanted to let the readers on the forum know about it and suspect I will certainly not be alone in finding this turn of events regrettable regardless of the availability of comparable products. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Replacement for Retumbo - 28 Nosler
Top