Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
Politics Of Hunting & Guns (NOT General Politics)
Repealing the Second Amendment of the Bill of Rights
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="5RWill" data-source="post: 1424975" data-attributes="member: 98561"><p>I'm paraphrasing from a reddit post without the profanity but essentially this.</p><p></p><p>"You cannot control an entire country and it's people with tanks, jets, battleships, and drones or any of these things that the libs so stupidly believe trumps citizen ownership of firearms. </p><p></p><p>A fighter jet, tank, drone, battleship, or whatever cannot stand on street corners and enforce "no assembly" edicts. A fighter jet cannot kick down your door at 3AM and search your house for contraband. </p><p></p><p>None of these things can maintain the needed police state to completely subjugate and enslave people of a nation. Those weapons are for decimating, fattening, and glassing large areas and may people at once and fighting other state militaries. The government (regardless of who allegedly would take over) doesn't want to kill all of it's people and blow up it's own infrastructure as they're the very things they need in the first place.</p><p></p><p>So they need boots on the ground without an armed populace to which they would be vastly outnumbered.</p><p></p><p>If you want living examples of this, look at every insurgency that the U.S. military has tried to destroy. They're all still kicking with nothing but AK-47s, pick up trucks, and IEDs because these big scary military monsters libs allude to are all but useless for dealing with them."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="5RWill, post: 1424975, member: 98561"] I'm paraphrasing from a reddit post without the profanity but essentially this. "You cannot control an entire country and it's people with tanks, jets, battleships, and drones or any of these things that the libs so stupidly believe trumps citizen ownership of firearms. A fighter jet, tank, drone, battleship, or whatever cannot stand on street corners and enforce "no assembly" edicts. A fighter jet cannot kick down your door at 3AM and search your house for contraband. None of these things can maintain the needed police state to completely subjugate and enslave people of a nation. Those weapons are for decimating, fattening, and glassing large areas and may people at once and fighting other state militaries. The government (regardless of who allegedly would take over) doesn't want to kill all of it's people and blow up it's own infrastructure as they're the very things they need in the first place. So they need boots on the ground without an armed populace to which they would be vastly outnumbered. If you want living examples of this, look at every insurgency that the U.S. military has tried to destroy. They're all still kicking with nothing but AK-47s, pick up trucks, and IEDs because these big scary military monsters libs allude to are all but useless for dealing with them." [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
Politics Of Hunting & Guns (NOT General Politics)
Repealing the Second Amendment of the Bill of Rights
Top