Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Remington 700 extractor verses m16 style verses sako extractor
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Beandog" data-source="post: 1154694" data-attributes="member: 89873"><p>Run with the factory extractor until it gives up. Then have it replaced. </p><p></p><p>I found that as I reloaded and thus reused brass, the rim would become rounded. This brass with the worn rim is more likely to fail to extract cleanly with the factory unit which is essentially rigid. </p><p></p><p>When I had the rifle rebarrelled and blueprinted, a Sako style extractor was installed. This extractor, because it moves (as does a M16 style) when engaging the rim, has been more reliable. The Sako also seems to be less destructive to the rim as it engaged. As observed on a new batch of brass put in service when the rifle came back from the smith last year. </p><p></p><p>For the record, the rifle is a 260 and the load is a moderate one and resizing is minimal. Therefore I seem to get considerable life from the brass. </p><p></p><p>Beandog</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Beandog, post: 1154694, member: 89873"] Run with the factory extractor until it gives up. Then have it replaced. I found that as I reloaded and thus reused brass, the rim would become rounded. This brass with the worn rim is more likely to fail to extract cleanly with the factory unit which is essentially rigid. When I had the rifle rebarrelled and blueprinted, a Sako style extractor was installed. This extractor, because it moves (as does a M16 style) when engaging the rim, has been more reliable. The Sako also seems to be less destructive to the rim as it engaged. As observed on a new batch of brass put in service when the rifle came back from the smith last year. For the record, the rifle is a 260 and the load is a moderate one and resizing is minimal. Therefore I seem to get considerable life from the brass. Beandog [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Remington 700 extractor verses m16 style verses sako extractor
Top