Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
The Basics, Starting Out
Reloading Issue: Why do measurements vary?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="orkan" data-source="post: 2616252" data-attributes="member: 25377"><p>Since when does the "majority" have anything to do with "the best." On just what basis do you draw your conclusion that I haven't "done my research?" If your entire argument is that you know what you're talking about, and I don't... regardless of facts, just let me know and I'll end this discussion. </p><p></p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2022/02/berger-southwest-nationals-equipment-list-from-2020/[/URL]</p><p></p><p>"Best" optic is a nightforce scope? Sorry, but I don't think so. lol</p><p></p><p>Benchmark barrels must not shoot, because only 3 people use them... so the 150 or so I've done load workups on shooting in the .2's or better must just be a fluke? </p><p></p><p>Only 3 people running Alpha Munitions brass... it must be terrible too huh? No, actually it's better than Lapua. Last year there were more benchrest records set with Alpha, than any brass ever in one year. Almost no one was using it. </p><p></p><p>Some of the "best" lines up with "most" on your precious lists... yet the correlation does not equal causation. Most people are woefully inadequate to place any products in a hierarchy... even within their own discipline. They simply do not have the funds or the time to own and use enough samples of each to draw a right and proper conclusion. So they use what they use, and that doesn't mean anything other than that's what they use. If EVERYONE switched over to Alpha brass... everyone would experience better performances very likely, yet there's a problem: Square range shooters are notoriously stuck in their ways. The people consistently winning are consistently changing. Everyone else is just there to feed them points. Just like every other competition... the top 5-10 people at each event are the only ones actually competing. The rest lost before they showed up. They aren't shooters. Shooting is their hobby, it's not what they are. </p><p></p><p><strong>What would the majority of them, know about the best of anything? </strong></p><p></p><p>----------- </p><p><a href="https://www.instagram.com/primalrights" target="_blank">Follow on Instagram</a></p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/primalrights" target="_blank">Subscribe on YouTube</a></p><p><a href="https://amzn.to/3txlBnp" target="_blank">Amazon Affiliate</a></p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.primalrights.com" target="_blank"><img src="http://primalrights.com/images/signatures/sig1.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="orkan, post: 2616252, member: 25377"] Since when does the "majority" have anything to do with "the best." On just what basis do you draw your conclusion that I haven't "done my research?" If your entire argument is that you know what you're talking about, and I don't... regardless of facts, just let me know and I'll end this discussion. [URL unfurl="true"]https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2022/02/berger-southwest-nationals-equipment-list-from-2020/[/URL] "Best" optic is a nightforce scope? Sorry, but I don't think so. lol Benchmark barrels must not shoot, because only 3 people use them... so the 150 or so I've done load workups on shooting in the .2's or better must just be a fluke? Only 3 people running Alpha Munitions brass... it must be terrible too huh? No, actually it's better than Lapua. Last year there were more benchrest records set with Alpha, than any brass ever in one year. Almost no one was using it. Some of the "best" lines up with "most" on your precious lists... yet the correlation does not equal causation. Most people are woefully inadequate to place any products in a hierarchy... even within their own discipline. They simply do not have the funds or the time to own and use enough samples of each to draw a right and proper conclusion. So they use what they use, and that doesn't mean anything other than that's what they use. If EVERYONE switched over to Alpha brass... everyone would experience better performances very likely, yet there's a problem: Square range shooters are notoriously stuck in their ways. The people consistently winning are consistently changing. Everyone else is just there to feed them points. Just like every other competition... the top 5-10 people at each event are the only ones actually competing. The rest lost before they showed up. They aren't shooters. Shooting is their hobby, it's not what they are. [B]What would the majority of them, know about the best of anything? [/B] ----------- [URL='https://www.instagram.com/primalrights']Follow on Instagram[/URL] [URL='https://www.youtube.com/user/primalrights']Subscribe on YouTube[/URL] [URL='https://amzn.to/3txlBnp']Amazon Affiliate[/URL] [URL='http://www.primalrights.com'][IMG]http://primalrights.com/images/signatures/sig1.jpg[/IMG][/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
The Basics, Starting Out
Reloading Issue: Why do measurements vary?
Top