Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Recovered Barnes bullet
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="toddc" data-source="post: 1262391" data-attributes="member: 4566"><p>I'll buy that for a dollar. The expansion is what makes this very difficult to figure. What if we use solids? A flatnose solid will definitely damage a lot more medium than a bore rider needle point per about every ballistic guru of the last 120 yrs. How does that figure? Elmer Keith and Taylor all figured nose shape into knockdown values. Their research is a few years back but is still well regarded. The only way to test shape in a medium is with a solid. Otherwise we are testing EXPANSION not SHAPE. Whats our take on that?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="toddc, post: 1262391, member: 4566"] I'll buy that for a dollar. The expansion is what makes this very difficult to figure. What if we use solids? A flatnose solid will definitely damage a lot more medium than a bore rider needle point per about every ballistic guru of the last 120 yrs. How does that figure? Elmer Keith and Taylor all figured nose shape into knockdown values. Their research is a few years back but is still well regarded. The only way to test shape in a medium is with a solid. Otherwise we are testing EXPANSION not SHAPE. Whats our take on that? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Recovered Barnes bullet
Top