Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Re-chambering Completed!!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="shortgrass" data-source="post: 457792" data-attributes="member: 24284"><p>I just couldn't resist, compared chamber prints of .264 Win. Mag. & 6.5x61 Super. They appear to have similar capacity and the loading manual I looked at showed the .264 with about the same charge weight with same bullet weights. I guess it boils down to what one would consider "exceptable accuracy" when it comes to barrel life. The 1200 rds. I mentioned earlier for the 6.5x284 refers to the tactical 'match' rifles I've worked with. Those guys screw a new tube on every year!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="shortgrass, post: 457792, member: 24284"] I just couldn't resist, compared chamber prints of .264 Win. Mag. & 6.5x61 Super. They appear to have similar capacity and the loading manual I looked at showed the .264 with about the same charge weight with same bullet weights. I guess it boils down to what one would consider "exceptable accuracy" when it comes to barrel life. The 1200 rds. I mentioned earlier for the 6.5x284 refers to the tactical 'match' rifles I've worked with. Those guys screw a new tube on every year! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Re-chambering Completed!!
Top