Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Equipment Discussions
Rangefinder Field Test: Swarovski 8x30 Laser Guide Vs. Leica CRF 1600 Rangemaster
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="highridge1" data-source="post: 647530" data-attributes="member: 10327"><p><strong>Re: Rangefinder Field Test: Swarovski 8x30 Laser Guide Vs. Leica CRF 1600 Rangemaste</strong></p><p></p><p>I have owned both the leica 1600 and still own the Swaro, The Leica is good but the swaro is better. The swaro ranges further and far more consistent. It also holds alot steadier than the Leica.If the Zeiss PRF ranged a little further I would rate it above the Leica 1600 too.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="highridge1, post: 647530, member: 10327"] [b]Re: Rangefinder Field Test: Swarovski 8x30 Laser Guide Vs. Leica CRF 1600 Rangemaste[/b] I have owned both the leica 1600 and still own the Swaro, The Leica is good but the swaro is better. The swaro ranges further and far more consistent. It also holds alot steadier than the Leica.If the Zeiss PRF ranged a little further I would rate it above the Leica 1600 too. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Equipment Discussions
Rangefinder Field Test: Swarovski 8x30 Laser Guide Vs. Leica CRF 1600 Rangemaster
Top