Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Equipment Discussions
Rangefinder Field Test: Swarovski 8x30 Laser Guide Vs. Leica CRF 1600 Rangemaster
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="gbmaryland" data-source="post: 547996" data-attributes="member: 35417"><p><strong>Re: Rangefinder Field Test: Swarovski 8x30 Laser Guide Vs. Leica CRF 1600 Rangemaste</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p> </p><p>I would suspect that they preform much better than either of the monoculars, and possibly as well as the binoculars of Leica or Swarovski.</p><p> </p><p>HOWEVER, while the Fusion binocular should crush the monocular versions of the Lieca or Swarovski for ranging, the glass is horrible compared to them.</p><p> </p><p>Only the Bushnell Elite 1600 ARC Monocular has reasonably decent glass, and performs well.</p><p> </p><p>Of course, what annoys the living hell out of me is that the Monocular version is made in China and the Binoculars are made in JAPAN. I would have expected the glass to be the other way around.</p><p> </p><p>At any rate, the Bushnell 1600 FUSION binocs are known to range well over 2000 yards without issue. Biggest consideration is that they are heavy and the glass has a significant bluish tint to it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="gbmaryland, post: 547996, member: 35417"] [b]Re: Rangefinder Field Test: Swarovski 8x30 Laser Guide Vs. Leica CRF 1600 Rangemaste[/b] I would suspect that they preform much better than either of the monoculars, and possibly as well as the binoculars of Leica or Swarovski. HOWEVER, while the Fusion binocular should crush the monocular versions of the Lieca or Swarovski for ranging, the glass is horrible compared to them. Only the Bushnell Elite 1600 ARC Monocular has reasonably decent glass, and performs well. Of course, what annoys the living hell out of me is that the Monocular version is made in China and the Binoculars are made in JAPAN. I would have expected the glass to be the other way around. At any rate, the Bushnell 1600 FUSION binocs are known to range well over 2000 yards without issue. Biggest consideration is that they are heavy and the glass has a significant bluish tint to it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Equipment Discussions
Rangefinder Field Test: Swarovski 8x30 Laser Guide Vs. Leica CRF 1600 Rangemaster
Top