Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Equipment Discussions
Rangefinder Field Test: Swarovski 8x30 Laser Guide Vs. Leica CRF 1600 Rangemaster
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SBruce" data-source="post: 517942" data-attributes="member: 21068"><p><strong>Re: Rangefinder Field Test: Swarovski 8x30 Laser Guide Vs. Leica CRF 1600 Rangemaste</strong></p><p></p><p>Paul,</p><p> </p><p>Are you sending the unit back for replacement? or just a total refund?</p><p> </p><p>I got a replacement from Leica within a couple of weeks and the 2nd one seems to work as it should.</p><p> </p><p>I agree with Jeff that some units are simply better than others, and I believe I got a good, possibly better than average 1200 too.</p><p> </p><p>Cottonwoods may not reflect the same as evergreens, but I tried freehand on two different cottonwoods in evening light the other day. a very small and sparsly leaved (partially dead) tree gave +/- 1590 yd readings about 1 of 4 tries. Another large and fully leaved tree gave +/- 1740 yd readings 100% no problem at all, no missed readings.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SBruce, post: 517942, member: 21068"] [b]Re: Rangefinder Field Test: Swarovski 8x30 Laser Guide Vs. Leica CRF 1600 Rangemaste[/b] Paul, Are you sending the unit back for replacement? or just a total refund? I got a replacement from Leica within a couple of weeks and the 2nd one seems to work as it should. I agree with Jeff that some units are simply better than others, and I believe I got a good, possibly better than average 1200 too. Cottonwoods may not reflect the same as evergreens, but I tried freehand on two different cottonwoods in evening light the other day. a very small and sparsly leaved (partially dead) tree gave +/- 1590 yd readings about 1 of 4 tries. Another large and fully leaved tree gave +/- 1740 yd readings 100% no problem at all, no missed readings. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Equipment Discussions
Rangefinder Field Test: Swarovski 8x30 Laser Guide Vs. Leica CRF 1600 Rangemaster
Top