Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Equipment Discussions
Rangefinder Field Test: Swarovski 8x30 Laser Guide Vs. Leica CRF 1600 Rangemaster
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pdvdh" data-source="post: 514485" data-attributes="member: 4191"><p><strong>Re: Rangefinder Field Test: Swarovski 8x30 Laser Guide Vs. Leica CRF 1600 Rangemaste</strong></p><p></p><p>Jeff,</p><p>Excellent feedback. That helps me sort out whether or not my CRF 1600 performance is normal or abnormal. Hope to get additional feedback from other CRF 1600 forum member/owners also. </p><p></p><p>Thank you for sharing your experience with this relatively new Leica offering.</p><p></p><p></p><p><u>Edit</u>: One addition to my initial post. When I stated I preferred the Leica in every way over the Swaro Laser Guide, I neglected to mention that the Swarovski does excel in providing the substantially better view, with respect to the field of view, resolution, and light transmission. The Swarovski glass is good enough that I have used the 8x30 Laser Guide as a monocular for general viewing and spotting of game, in the past. I'll sometimes leave the binoculars at the house and simply use the Swaro as my substitute for binoculars. I own a set of 8x30mm SLC Swarovski binoculars, and the Swaro Laser Guide rangefinder glass seems the equivalent of the 8x30 SLCs. Which is pretty darn good glass.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pdvdh, post: 514485, member: 4191"] [b]Re: Rangefinder Field Test: Swarovski 8x30 Laser Guide Vs. Leica CRF 1600 Rangemaste[/b] Jeff, Excellent feedback. That helps me sort out whether or not my CRF 1600 performance is normal or abnormal. Hope to get additional feedback from other CRF 1600 forum member/owners also. Thank you for sharing your experience with this relatively new Leica offering. [U]Edit[/U]: One addition to my initial post. When I stated I preferred the Leica in every way over the Swaro Laser Guide, I neglected to mention that the Swarovski does excel in providing the substantially better view, with respect to the field of view, resolution, and light transmission. The Swarovski glass is good enough that I have used the 8x30 Laser Guide as a monocular for general viewing and spotting of game, in the past. I'll sometimes leave the binoculars at the house and simply use the Swaro as my substitute for binoculars. I own a set of 8x30mm SLC Swarovski binoculars, and the Swaro Laser Guide rangefinder glass seems the equivalent of the 8x30 SLCs. Which is pretty darn good glass. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Equipment Discussions
Rangefinder Field Test: Swarovski 8x30 Laser Guide Vs. Leica CRF 1600 Rangemaster
Top