Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
QL and why or GRT
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ARlife4me" data-source="post: 2715391" data-attributes="member: 105694"><p>My main concern on development is pressure! The output/results on fps and energy are of less concern. I've used (based on published load data from various mfgs that list fill %) info and input said data then it's a wild projection of what was listed. Say, 108% will produce 20k over pressure on said published data. Even using their starting load (according to QL) can be over pressure. I'm just glad I haven't found out the hard way and gun went kaboom on me by using published data. ONLY 1 time I've used a data result from QL on a pistol load (357sig). I was fortunate with results! I do cross check my input on QL against published info for referencing. And they say that Nosler uses QL for data seems crazy, especially when their data and the QL I have aren't even close on pressure! I guess they did some tweaking on their end before publishing.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ARlife4me, post: 2715391, member: 105694"] My main concern on development is pressure! The output/results on fps and energy are of less concern. I've used (based on published load data from various mfgs that list fill %) info and input said data then it's a wild projection of what was listed. Say, 108% will produce 20k over pressure on said published data. Even using their starting load (according to QL) can be over pressure. I'm just glad I haven't found out the hard way and gun went kaboom on me by using published data. ONLY 1 time I've used a data result from QL on a pistol load (357sig). I was fortunate with results! I do cross check my input on QL against published info for referencing. And they say that Nosler uses QL for data seems crazy, especially when their data and the QL I have aren't even close on pressure! I guess they did some tweaking on their end before publishing. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
QL and why or GRT
Top