Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Possible New Bullet Venture
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MontanaRifleman" data-source="post: 835571" data-attributes="member: 11717"><p>The general rule of thumb is shorter bearing surface and longer nose = higher BC. There is a point, depending on cal and bullet length where you can only go so short before problems follow. The hybrids are close to that point. ATM, the Hybrid design is the most efficient BC design out there. I don't see that changing but I could be wrong.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MontanaRifleman, post: 835571, member: 11717"] The general rule of thumb is shorter bearing surface and longer nose = higher BC. There is a point, depending on cal and bullet length where you can only go so short before problems follow. The hybrids are close to that point. ATM, the Hybrid design is the most efficient BC design out there. I don't see that changing but I could be wrong. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Possible New Bullet Venture
Top