Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Poor Man's 270 Sherman Possibility?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="nksmfamjp" data-source="post: 1837547" data-attributes="member: 1951"><p>I would spend my time/money on shooting(rest/technique improvement), scope, reloading and restocking/bedding in that order. Likely your rest and technique are holding you back most severely.</p><p></p><p>i would hold off on the Sherman conversion. Dies alone can be like 4-6 times the price of std dies. Then you have to consider case trimming, annealing, rifle modification etc. Still, the Sherman looks like a great round! What is your mag length? Rich recommends 3.6".....30-06 based rounds are often 3.4".</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="nksmfamjp, post: 1837547, member: 1951"] I would spend my time/money on shooting(rest/technique improvement), scope, reloading and restocking/bedding in that order. Likely your rest and technique are holding you back most severely. i would hold off on the Sherman conversion. Dies alone can be like 4-6 times the price of std dies. Then you have to consider case trimming, annealing, rifle modification etc. Still, the Sherman looks like a great round! What is your mag length? Rich recommends 3.6”.....30-06 based rounds are often 3.4”. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Poor Man's 270 Sherman Possibility?
Top