Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Gunsmithing
Pillar/skim bedding question
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WapitiBob" data-source="post: 607090" data-attributes="member: 38015"><p>I have seen two schools of thought on pillar bedding techniques. One, the action and the btm metal only touch the pillars, with a non load bearing bed around the action.</p><p></p><p>The other, the action is on the pillars with the non load bearing bed around it, and the btm metal is up tight into the stock.</p><p></p><p>Is there any significant difference, accuracy potential wise?</p><p> Also, with an aluminum bed block style stock, it would seem that the btm metal would have to be tight up into the cut out.</p><p>Do you really need to care about the btm metal?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WapitiBob, post: 607090, member: 38015"] I have seen two schools of thought on pillar bedding techniques. One, the action and the btm metal only touch the pillars, with a non load bearing bed around the action. The other, the action is on the pillars with the non load bearing bed around it, and the btm metal is up tight into the stock. Is there any significant difference, accuracy potential wise? Also, with an aluminum bed block style stock, it would seem that the btm metal would have to be tight up into the cut out. Do you really need to care about the btm metal? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Gunsmithing
Pillar/skim bedding question
Top