Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Picking My .300 WM Scope
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Old Rooster" data-source="post: 2207650" data-attributes="member: 108576"><p>My scope came IN,FEENIX.Silly guys</p><p>I have several Leupolds and 1 Bushnell Nitro and I feel the Leupold's has an advantage.Don't own Burris anymore but owned a few years ago and would put the Crimson Trace in a similar category but my clearest scope is Zeiss Conquest with my eyes.</p><p>I would say it's in the same class as my Vortex's scopes and I like them.</p><p>I have Athlon scope and feel with my eyes the Athlon is a good bit better but that may be different with your eyes.I also own a couple of Nikon Monarch and feel the Nikon is a bit crisper.</p><p>Other's may see it different since ocular disparity hits us all at some point in our years but for 300.00 bucks it's a great buy.</p><p>The reticle is small on lowest setting but I can still read the numbers.Younger eyes may see it differently but on 16 I can watch the birds in tree's and can tell the sparrow's from the robin's at around 200 yards.I can see colors on small birds so it is pretty clear.</p><p>Most likely you will not regret your purchase if you get a Crimson Trace,no regrets here so far but I just got it and still in the box until I decide which rifle to put it on.</p><p>Old Rooster</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Old Rooster, post: 2207650, member: 108576"] My scope came IN,FEENIX.Silly guys I have several Leupolds and 1 Bushnell Nitro and I feel the Leupold's has an advantage.Don't own Burris anymore but owned a few years ago and would put the Crimson Trace in a similar category but my clearest scope is Zeiss Conquest with my eyes. I would say it's in the same class as my Vortex's scopes and I like them. I have Athlon scope and feel with my eyes the Athlon is a good bit better but that may be different with your eyes.I also own a couple of Nikon Monarch and feel the Nikon is a bit crisper. Other's may see it different since ocular disparity hits us all at some point in our years but for 300.00 bucks it's a great buy. The reticle is small on lowest setting but I can still read the numbers.Younger eyes may see it differently but on 16 I can watch the birds in tree's and can tell the sparrow's from the robin's at around 200 yards.I can see colors on small birds so it is pretty clear. Most likely you will not regret your purchase if you get a Crimson Trace,no regrets here so far but I just got it and still in the box until I decide which rifle to put it on. Old Rooster [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Picking My .300 WM Scope
Top