Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Petition to Leupold for MOA reticle
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SBruce" data-source="post: 439418" data-attributes="member: 21068"><p>I am all in on this one! I would gladly send in my Mark 4 TMR for a MOA replacement! Possibly even send in the VX-7 VH reticle for a MOA replacement!</p><p> </p><p>Something along the lines of 1 moa on the vertical and 1 to 2 moa on the horizontal. Seems like they could take the TMR and just change the spacing to moa's instead of mills?</p><p> </p><p>I would be all for this if they would only do it.</p><p> </p><p>While we're on the subject, and if it would take a total overhaul, then why not just do "shooters moa" or IPHY.</p><p><strong>Seriously</strong>, those of us that use reticles for ranging or holdover or even follow up shots, usually are actually thinking in terms of IPHY anyway. It's way easier to visualize and mentally calculate, not to mention faster! That way, 20 IPHY worth of clicks would actually (theoretically) move the poi 20" instead of 21 at 100 yds. Holding over 10 IPHY at 800 yds would then be simply 80" instead of 83.7". Ranging would be far more accurate and much simpler with IPHY and I believe most decent ballistic programs have an output option for IPHY.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SBruce, post: 439418, member: 21068"] I am all in on this one! I would gladly send in my Mark 4 TMR for a MOA replacement! Possibly even send in the VX-7 VH reticle for a MOA replacement! Something along the lines of 1 moa on the vertical and 1 to 2 moa on the horizontal. Seems like they could take the TMR and just change the spacing to moa's instead of mills? I would be all for this if they would only do it. While we're on the subject, and if it would take a total overhaul, then why not just do "shooters moa" or IPHY. [B]Seriously[/B], those of us that use reticles for ranging or holdover or even follow up shots, usually are actually thinking in terms of IPHY anyway. It's way easier to visualize and mentally calculate, not to mention faster! That way, 20 IPHY worth of clicks would actually (theoretically) move the poi 20" instead of 21 at 100 yds. Holding over 10 IPHY at 800 yds would then be simply 80" instead of 83.7". Ranging would be far more accurate and much simpler with IPHY and I believe most decent ballistic programs have an output option for IPHY. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Petition to Leupold for MOA reticle
Top