Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Peterson Brass Article - New Caliber Development
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mike Matteson" data-source="post: 2559768" data-attributes="member: 101791"><p>I haven't had the time to check out the dimensionally. I do know in the 500 280AI cases that the COAL was off between 50 cases that I did measure by .0065" between long and short. The reason for that is I cut the necks for thickness, and have to have the same or should have the same stopping point on the brass for concentricity. My thinking is fireforming would take care of the rest. Now volume case weight I haven't gotten that far yet. I figured that I would need to fireform them first, then measure for volume weight.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mike Matteson, post: 2559768, member: 101791"] I haven't had the time to check out the dimensionally. I do know in the 500 280AI cases that the COAL was off between 50 cases that I did measure by .0065" between long and short. The reason for that is I cut the necks for thickness, and have to have the same or should have the same stopping point on the brass for concentricity. My thinking is fireforming would take care of the rest. Now volume case weight I haven't gotten that far yet. I figured that I would need to fireform them first, then measure for volume weight. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Peterson Brass Article - New Caliber Development
Top