Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
Politics Of Hunting & Guns (NOT General Politics)
PA. Votes NO
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="yobuck" data-source="post: 1302307" data-attributes="member: 12443"><p>Well Bigngreen your talking about shooters, as in competition, and what this discussion is about is hunting. There is a significant difference between the two. Any type shooting that can advance the cause is great in my opinion and I would think most others also.</p><p>If you feel hunting should be based on individual ability as for shooting that's fine.</p><p>Lets then eliminate all the crutches, including any device which aids a shooter to make a more accurate shot.</p><p>You just happen to know people who claim they can shoot as well prone using a bipod</p><p> as they can from a bench. I have no argument with that, because I know that its possible. But let me pick the location where they shoot, and the situation will change</p><p>considerably.</p><p> Now the benches I'm referring to could be rocks piled up in order to rest a gun on, or a tree stump with a board nailed onto it, or a nice portable small table type bench. But as I said earlier, the very mention of the word bench irks some people, and the fact is many of them live west of the Mississippi. But regional differences of opinion are fine with me, how others feel is their problem.</p><p>But back to the subject matter, which is the decision of the PA game commission to</p><p>decline the use of semi auto firearms for the taking of (big game animals).</p><p>There are those like me who applaud the decision, and others who feel it was a</p><p>bad decision.</p><p>But the fact remains, nobody has been denied being able to hunt with a variety of </p><p>different choices, in a state offering oppurtunities others can only wish for.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="yobuck, post: 1302307, member: 12443"] Well Bigngreen your talking about shooters, as in competition, and what this discussion is about is hunting. There is a significant difference between the two. Any type shooting that can advance the cause is great in my opinion and I would think most others also. If you feel hunting should be based on individual ability as for shooting that's fine. Lets then eliminate all the crutches, including any device which aids a shooter to make a more accurate shot. You just happen to know people who claim they can shoot as well prone using a bipod as they can from a bench. I have no argument with that, because I know that its possible. But let me pick the location where they shoot, and the situation will change considerably. Now the benches I'm referring to could be rocks piled up in order to rest a gun on, or a tree stump with a board nailed onto it, or a nice portable small table type bench. But as I said earlier, the very mention of the word bench irks some people, and the fact is many of them live west of the Mississippi. But regional differences of opinion are fine with me, how others feel is their problem. But back to the subject matter, which is the decision of the PA game commission to decline the use of semi auto firearms for the taking of (big game animals). There are those like me who applaud the decision, and others who feel it was a bad decision. But the fact remains, nobody has been denied being able to hunt with a variety of different choices, in a state offering oppurtunities others can only wish for. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
Politics Of Hunting & Guns (NOT General Politics)
PA. Votes NO
Top