Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Oehler 35P Questions
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pdvdh" data-source="post: 381846" data-attributes="member: 4191"><p>Your position surprises me. Do you not understand the advantages? Or do you understand the advantages but not value those advantages? I suppose it really depends on one's purpose(s) for chronographing loads relative to the level of time and effort one is willing to invest in the process. Running the second chronograph in tandem requires no more additional time than to set the second unit down next to the first, and stringing the extra set of cables to it. My two sets of skyscreens are permanently mounted on a 6' long rail.</p><p></p><p>I articulate, as well as demonstrate, advantages of concurrently running a second chronograph in tandem in the following posts/threads. "Jon A" does likewise in the last of the below links. If you read these posts/threads and still don't understand the advantage, then it is probably more a matter that in your opinion chronographs aren't worth the fuss, and they likely haven't found a place in your load development and LRH toolbox.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.longrangehunting.com/forums/f19/280-ai-replacement-270-win-43784/index12.html" target="_blank">http://www.longrangehunting.com/forums/f19/280-ai-replacement-270-win-43784/index12.html</a></p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.longrangehunting.com/forums/f19/es-sd-54377/" target="_blank">http://www.longrangehunting.com/forums/f19/es-sd-54377/</a></p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.longrangehunting.com/forums/f19/loadbase-3-0-mobile-w-g7-bc-test-results-46812/" target="_blank">http://www.longrangehunting.com/forums/f19/loadbase-3-0-mobile-w-g7-bc-test-results-46812/</a></p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.longrangehunting.com/forums/f17/best-west-really-best-47550/index17.html#post343178" target="_blank">http://www.longrangehunting.com/forums/f17/best-west-really-best-47550/index17.html#post343178</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pdvdh, post: 381846, member: 4191"] Your position surprises me. Do you not understand the advantages? Or do you understand the advantages but not value those advantages? I suppose it really depends on one's purpose(s) for chronographing loads relative to the level of time and effort one is willing to invest in the process. Running the second chronograph in tandem requires no more additional time than to set the second unit down next to the first, and stringing the extra set of cables to it. My two sets of skyscreens are permanently mounted on a 6' long rail. I articulate, as well as demonstrate, advantages of concurrently running a second chronograph in tandem in the following posts/threads. "Jon A" does likewise in the last of the below links. If you read these posts/threads and still don't understand the advantage, then it is probably more a matter that in your opinion chronographs aren't worth the fuss, and they likely haven't found a place in your load development and LRH toolbox. [url]http://www.longrangehunting.com/forums/f19/280-ai-replacement-270-win-43784/index12.html[/url] [url]http://www.longrangehunting.com/forums/f19/es-sd-54377/[/url] [url]http://www.longrangehunting.com/forums/f19/loadbase-3-0-mobile-w-g7-bc-test-results-46812/[/url] [url]http://www.longrangehunting.com/forums/f17/best-west-really-best-47550/index17.html#post343178[/url] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Oehler 35P Questions
Top