Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
OCW opinions?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="birdiemc" data-source="post: 1566009" data-attributes="member: 29632"><p>Honestly there's not a HUGE shift in POI across your whole range...</p><p>The idea behind OCW, as I understand it, is to allow you to determine what charge you want to use that gives you some wiggle room in both directions without much shift in POI. So you have to determine for yourself how much wiggle room you need. If you are capable of loading and achieving single digit es/sd's then you need a little less wiggle room than the guy who just crammed his first bullet in a case this morning. </p><p>My 2 scales suck, so I like the thought of 42.1 because you get +-.2 gr without effecting POI more than the size of your best group in that picture. </p><p>As Mike stated, 42.2 would be good, less POI shift, less margin. What are you comfortable with? </p><p></p><p>And 43.1 looks awesome, but in the spirit of OCW you would load 43.0 and play with seating depth.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="birdiemc, post: 1566009, member: 29632"] Honestly there's not a HUGE shift in POI across your whole range... The idea behind OCW, as I understand it, is to allow you to determine what charge you want to use that gives you some wiggle room in both directions without much shift in POI. So you have to determine for yourself how much wiggle room you need. If you are capable of loading and achieving single digit es/sd's then you need a little less wiggle room than the guy who just crammed his first bullet in a case this morning. My 2 scales suck, so I like the thought of 42.1 because you get +-.2 gr without effecting POI more than the size of your best group in that picture. As Mike stated, 42.2 would be good, less POI shift, less margin. What are you comfortable with? And 43.1 looks awesome, but in the spirit of OCW you would load 43.0 and play with seating depth. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
OCW opinions?
Top