Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Not so scientific look at how bullets perform.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rooster721" data-source="post: 942274" data-attributes="member: 40654"><p>Litz says .673 officially averaging it from 3000 right down to 1000fps... if I recall correctly, it's 0.706 for the 3000 to 2500fps range tho* They're very very accurate bullets, only problem I've ran into is tearing jackets-- under 3000 they seem to be good/over 3000 and this last batch of tests I had 3 or 4 (out of 15) never hit paper... chrony took it's reading, then someplace past there they dusted ? Wish the jackets were tougher. They'd be unbelievable with their 190gr weight.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rooster721, post: 942274, member: 40654"] Litz says .673 officially averaging it from 3000 right down to 1000fps... if I recall correctly, it's 0.706 for the 3000 to 2500fps range tho* They're very very accurate bullets, only problem I've ran into is tearing jackets-- under 3000 they seem to be good/over 3000 and this last batch of tests I had 3 or 4 (out of 15) never hit paper... chrony took it's reading, then someplace past there they dusted ? Wish the jackets were tougher. They'd be unbelievable with their 190gr weight. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Not so scientific look at how bullets perform.
Top