Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Not so happy with the Accubonds
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ridge Runner" data-source="post: 233059" data-attributes="member: 951"><p>yeah right,</p><p>1) shot a deer perfectly with an accubond</p><p>2) shot was perfect cause I said so</p><p>3) deer got away</p><p>4) anyone who questions it is stupid, I been hunting 2 decades, so I'm right</p><p></p><p>well, after 40 years of hunting deer, though I'm not formaly educated, I'm not stupid. </p><p>Derik has himself convinced he knows it all so he'll learn nothing no matter what anyone says. if the shot was in fact perfect, where's the deer, no way can he convinse anyone but himself that something isn't right with his story.</p><p> I've taken probably 20 deer with the accubonds, they all shared the same traits, the bullet expanded and exited, except 1, that one hit a limb, made a tennis ball sized entry wound, traveled through 3 feet of venison and still took the lungs out.</p><p> since he had no logical arguement for my questions he had to fall back on my grammar, and in that dept. he's probably right, didn't know Len required us to be rhodes scholars to post here. </p><p>Let him claim bullet failure, just shows his arrogance to make statements like he has with absolutely No Proof!</p><p>RR</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ridge Runner, post: 233059, member: 951"] yeah right, 1) shot a deer perfectly with an accubond 2) shot was perfect cause I said so 3) deer got away 4) anyone who questions it is stupid, I been hunting 2 decades, so I'm right well, after 40 years of hunting deer, though I'm not formaly educated, I'm not stupid. Derik has himself convinced he knows it all so he'll learn nothing no matter what anyone says. if the shot was in fact perfect, where's the deer, no way can he convinse anyone but himself that something isn't right with his story. I've taken probably 20 deer with the accubonds, they all shared the same traits, the bullet expanded and exited, except 1, that one hit a limb, made a tennis ball sized entry wound, traveled through 3 feet of venison and still took the lungs out. since he had no logical arguement for my questions he had to fall back on my grammar, and in that dept. he's probably right, didn't know Len required us to be rhodes scholars to post here. Let him claim bullet failure, just shows his arrogance to make statements like he has with absolutely No Proof! RR [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Not so happy with the Accubonds
Top