Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Nosler LR Accubonds: BC testing results
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Michael Eichele" data-source="post: 968324" data-attributes="member: 1007"><p>Hornady does an outstanding job determining and publishing BCs. Litz publishes .633 for the 208 and hornady publishes .648 as you know. You have to remember that BC values change with velocity. BCs are also typically lower in the first bit of their flight. Litz gathers BC data at different velocities and averages them out. I've personally fired the 208 at .671 at 2900-2950'sec and .647 at 2650-2700 so yes I would say hornady's number of .648 is accurate depending on a given point of view.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Michael Eichele, post: 968324, member: 1007"] Hornady does an outstanding job determining and publishing BCs. Litz publishes .633 for the 208 and hornady publishes .648 as you know. You have to remember that BC values change with velocity. BCs are also typically lower in the first bit of their flight. Litz gathers BC data at different velocities and averages them out. I've personally fired the 208 at .671 at 2900-2950'sec and .647 at 2650-2700 so yes I would say hornady's number of .648 is accurate depending on a given point of view. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Nosler LR Accubonds: BC testing results
Top