Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
North American Fires
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Canhunter35" data-source="post: 1468525" data-attributes="member: 101677"><p>The way I see it:</p><p>We have a forest.</p><p>A. We can lumber it, create jobs and lumber, economic value there</p><p>B. We can burn it. Now here's the crazy part so bare with me. In the 80's are the lowest atmospheric co2 levels recorded, since co2 levels have increased our crops are yielding levels that people thought impossible in the 80's. Studies show around a 25% increase in production because of increased co2 levels. So basically we burn carbon sinks like forests and up our food production so there's economic value there. while old and young people with asthma are at risk the plants like it</p><p></p><p>Personally I hate wildfires. A friend who was a volunteer firefighter died fighting wildfires last year along with two other guys were severely burnt in fires right near me. Yet I still think it criminally negligent to leave fires burn putting people and livelihoods at risk.</p><p></p><p>I also want to point out how flawed the logic is about letting forests burn. Policy: we've let the forests all burn and now because there's nothing left to burn we are no longer at risk.</p><p>That's insanity.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Canhunter35, post: 1468525, member: 101677"] The way I see it: We have a forest. A. We can lumber it, create jobs and lumber, economic value there B. We can burn it. Now here’s the crazy part so bare with me. In the 80’s are the lowest atmospheric co2 levels recorded, since co2 levels have increased our crops are yielding levels that people thought impossible in the 80’s. Studies show around a 25% increase in production because of increased co2 levels. So basically we burn carbon sinks like forests and up our food production so there’s economic value there. while old and young people with asthma are at risk the plants like it Personally I hate wildfires. A friend who was a volunteer firefighter died fighting wildfires last year along with two other guys were severely burnt in fires right near me. Yet I still think it criminally negligent to leave fires burn putting people and livelihoods at risk. I also want to point out how flawed the logic is about letting forests burn. Policy: we’ve let the forests all burn and now because there’s nothing left to burn we are no longer at risk. That’s insanity. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
North American Fires
Top