Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
Politics Of Hunting & Guns (NOT General Politics)
Non-resident license fees.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="huntercole" data-source="post: 2492627" data-attributes="member: 119359"><p>You don't want all the federal land to be state owned. States can't afford to maintain it, fight fires, maintain roads, etc and then need money for something else and will just sell the land. Then no one has access. States have already sold millions of acres of once public land.</p><p></p><p>I think you're pretty much stuck with non residents having higher prices. There can only be a set number of tags. You lower the nonresident prices significantly and a bunch more people are going to apply and then you'll have even less chance of getting a tag. What good is saving a couple hundred dollars if you can never draw the tag? I don't think there's anyway you'll get residents to average out the tag cost with nonresident prices and pay a few hundred dollars more and you can pretty much guarantee that they won't give up their tags to go to the nonresident tag quota.</p><p></p><p>Yeah, I wish nonresident tags weren't so expensive, but I see it as a cheap vacation. With tag and fuel I can go hunt for 10 days for around $100 a day. Spending time with friends and family, out doing what I love, exploring new country, and not at work. Can't beat it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="huntercole, post: 2492627, member: 119359"] You don't want all the federal land to be state owned. States can't afford to maintain it, fight fires, maintain roads, etc and then need money for something else and will just sell the land. Then no one has access. States have already sold millions of acres of once public land. I think you're pretty much stuck with non residents having higher prices. There can only be a set number of tags. You lower the nonresident prices significantly and a bunch more people are going to apply and then you'll have even less chance of getting a tag. What good is saving a couple hundred dollars if you can never draw the tag? I don't think there's anyway you'll get residents to average out the tag cost with nonresident prices and pay a few hundred dollars more and you can pretty much guarantee that they won't give up their tags to go to the nonresident tag quota. Yeah, I wish nonresident tags weren't so expensive, but I see it as a cheap vacation. With tag and fuel I can go hunt for 10 days for around $100 a day. Spending time with friends and family, out doing what I love, exploring new country, and not at work. Can't beat it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
Politics Of Hunting & Guns (NOT General Politics)
Non-resident license fees.
Top