Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Nolser CT Bullets are they worth their claim?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MontanaRifleman" data-source="post: 387976" data-attributes="member: 11717"><p>Nope, and Nosler doesn't make such a claim either (I talked with a tech about it). Not saying that this guy is BS'ing... maybe he got a different pressure - velocity curve out of his rifle. My experience is 3400 fps (maybe slightly higher) with 55.5 gr of RL17. With the 110 AB's, I got 3500 fps, also with 55.5 gr of RL17. Both max loads with my Sendero. That implies to me the coating gave no velocity benefit over the uncoated AB's. Not exactly apples to apples, but close.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MontanaRifleman, post: 387976, member: 11717"] Nope, and Nosler doesn't make such a claim either (I talked with a tech about it). Not saying that this guy is BS'ing... maybe he got a different pressure - velocity curve out of his rifle. My experience is 3400 fps (maybe slightly higher) with 55.5 gr of RL17. With the 110 AB's, I got 3500 fps, also with 55.5 gr of RL17. Both max loads with my Sendero. That implies to me the coating gave no velocity benefit over the uncoated AB's. Not exactly apples to apples, but close. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Nolser CT Bullets are they worth their claim?
Top