Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
The Basics, Starting Out
NF Scope or Leupold
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="parshal" data-source="post: 2101633" data-attributes="member: 605"><p>Something to consider for a rimfire scope, in addition to the parallax, is the reticle size if you end up with a FFP scope. I've run the ATACRs with the mil-xt scope on all my rifles. For a very short period of time I ran the 7-35. I found the reticle to be too small at 12-20 to use the subtensions. That's the mag range you'll be using most of the time in NRL or PRS. You might go to 25 but mostly not. For the NRL22 matches I swapped to the 4-16 ATACR and have never been wishing I had more magnifications. The subtensions are easily seen for holding wind.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="parshal, post: 2101633, member: 605"] Something to consider for a rimfire scope, in addition to the parallax, is the reticle size if you end up with a FFP scope. I've run the ATACRs with the mil-xt scope on all my rifles. For a very short period of time I ran the 7-35. I found the reticle to be too small at 12-20 to use the subtensions. That's the mag range you'll be using most of the time in NRL or PRS. You might go to 25 but mostly not. For the NRL22 matches I swapped to the 4-16 ATACR and have never been wishing I had more magnifications. The subtensions are easily seen for holding wind. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
The Basics, Starting Out
NF Scope or Leupold
Top