Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
New GSC 338 LRH bullets.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Gerard Schultz" data-source="post: 1046948" data-attributes="member: 51"><p>Mr Litz <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>I am not saying that your results are wrong, only that you are interpreting my technical information incorrectly. A good example of how you are seeing this is if I would say the predicted temperature is -10 and you assume -10F. I may mean -10C and those are two very different things. Or if I say that I built an F-Open rifle with a 76 cm barrel and you say "76 inches, that is incredible". You are interpreting it wrong and making some basic mistakes. Taking your toys and going home, is not the way to handle this. I have said Centigrade and centimetres several times now and you keep on thinking Farenheit and inches.</p><p></p><p> Name one instance or give one link to such an example. It will be most welcome.</p><p></p><p> Everything that I have done in bullet making since 1982 and turning bullets since 1992 has been the result of intense testing on the range, in the field and in ballistics labs. Just because I am not as prolific a writer as what you are, does not mean that what I do is sucking my thumb. However, I do have an opinion of any person who averages G1 BC numbers. </p><p></p><p> Every so often one bumps into someone that, perhaps has more depth of experience or knows something that one does not know. Perhaps this is such a time?</p><p></p><p>Should you change your mind about continuing this discussion, even by e-mail or here, I will be available of course.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Gerard Schultz, post: 1046948, member: 51"] Mr Litz :) I am not saying that your results are wrong, only that you are interpreting my technical information incorrectly. A good example of how you are seeing this is if I would say the predicted temperature is -10 and you assume -10F. I may mean -10C and those are two very different things. Or if I say that I built an F-Open rifle with a 76 cm barrel and you say "76 inches, that is incredible". You are interpreting it wrong and making some basic mistakes. Taking your toys and going home, is not the way to handle this. I have said Centigrade and centimetres several times now and you keep on thinking Farenheit and inches. Name one instance or give one link to such an example. It will be most welcome. Everything that I have done in bullet making since 1982 and turning bullets since 1992 has been the result of intense testing on the range, in the field and in ballistics labs. Just because I am not as prolific a writer as what you are, does not mean that what I do is sucking my thumb. However, I do have an opinion of any person who averages G1 BC numbers. Every so often one bumps into someone that, perhaps has more depth of experience or knows something that one does not know. Perhaps this is such a time? Should you change your mind about continuing this discussion, even by e-mail or here, I will be available of course. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
New GSC 338 LRH bullets.
Top